POCA 2015 Nominating Committee
DRAFT MINUTES
Tuesday, March 31, 2015
The meeting commenced at 7:00 p.m. All members
were in attendance: Raed Mulrenin (chair), Helen Kay, Bille Hougart, Jessica Patterson
Long, and Ed Mulrenin (secretary).
2. Nominating
Committee Guidelines. Discussed.
Committee agreed that these should be passed down to future nominating committees
to use as guidelines. Changes suggested
were for Chair to coordinate with board secretary how the nominating committee meshes
at the annual meeting.
Meeting was closed under provisions of the D.C. Condo Act.
3. Traffic on POC2015nominations@gmail.com Discussed. Ed reported that no one had sent
any emails to the Gmail address.
4. Report from all on contacts with
members. Discussed. Committee members reported on their contacts with Association
members on their interest in being nominated for the board. Several possibilities
came up, but most all of the contacts were negative. Several members still had not been heard from
so the list will remain open.
5. What the committee needs to do from
here. Discussed. Committee members should continue to pursue all who may be
a candidate. All prospective nominees
should be asked to send an e-mail to the committee’s email address stating: why
they wish to run for the board, what value they might add to the board, and a
brief bio about themselves. A photo
would be optional. The Committee agreed
with Raed when he said that he planned to send out a new notice to Association
members extending the deadline for nominations to April 10th with the
committee’s minutes attached. The committee would distribute the notice itself by
e-mail to save time and money, and to disengage the managing agent from the nominations/elections
process. (Subsequent to the meeting it was decided that the committee would
hold its April 19th
meeting and get the list of potential nominees firmed up. If final decisions
can be made at that time, its report would be prepared and sent to the
secretary for distribution with the annual meeting notice the next day. But if
at that time the committee felt compelled to interview someone or deliberate
further, the committee would instruct the board secretary to send out the
annual meeting notice without the committee’s report and that it would be sent out
separately after final decisions are made.
6. Resolution for resolving Two vs. Three
Seats issue. Discussed. Plan would be to draft resolution with two as lead,
and three as backup, but with the Committee’s
preference to resolve this issue in 2015 in the event of a vacancy on the board. Raed (Chair) and Ed (secretary) to go over
script for annual meeting to avoid confusion. Raed to discuss at next Board meeting. Nominating
committee to have a third nominee in mind if at meeting Resolution to solve
issue in 2015 is passed.
7. Format of Nominating Committee’s Report.
Discussed. Plan is to make resolution of number of seats issue clear enough in
written report so reading can be waived at annual meeting. Bottom of report will
state whether there will or will not be a minority report at annual meeting.
8. Agenda for April 19th
Meeting. Discussed
-
Review of Selection Criteria (see Minutes) (For Discussion)
-
Selection of Nominees (For Action)
-
Nominating Committee Report (For Action)
-
Minority Report (For Action)
-
Committee’s Report at Annual Meeting (For Discussion)
9. Schedule from Here. Next meeting
will be April 19th, 7:00 p.m
New Business
10. Need for Improvement in Election
Process. Bille and Raed raised the issue of the need for improvement in the
election process itself. The work of the
nominating committee could be in vain if the election process is not
fixed. Some examples were mentioned. Bille
posed the question of whether the committee ought to be charged or tasked with
supporting the election process. Ed mentioned that after last May’s election he
discussed the need for an annual meeting template with Jason (who is now
secretary). Ed also mentioned that outside
of the context of the nominating committee he had just sent a message to the
board about issues he discovered in the attendance and voting numbers with the
September election, eighteen in all, mostly dealing with the lack of official
records, the proxies, and the spreadsheet. The committee agreed that Raed should discuss
this matter of improving the election process with the board to the depth
necessary. Ed agreed to start a list of
suggestions, a template really, and Bille agreed to review it with him. The list will be circulated to committee members
before it is given to Raed to discuss, as he wishes, with the board.
The meeting adjourned at 8:30 p.m.